The concept of globalism now is most commonly used to refer to different ideologies advocating globalization.
In his 2005 book 'The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the World', Canadian philosopher John Ralston Saul treated globalism as coterminous with neoliberalism and neoliberal globalization.
The word itself came into widespread usage, first and foremost in the United States, from the early 1940s.
"...The first person in the United States to use the term economic integration in its modern sense (i.e. combining separate economies into larger economic regions) did so at this time: one John S. de Beers, an economist in the US Treasury Department, towards the end of 1941 [copyright by Wikipedia]."
Globalization or globalisation is the process of international integration arising from the interchange of world views, products, ideas, and other aspects of culture. The term globalization is very recent, only establishing its current meaning in the 1970s.
"...Cultural globalization refers to the transmission of ideas, meanings and values around the world in such a way as to extend and intensify social relations. This process is marked by the common consumption of cultures that have been diffused by the Internet, popular culture media, and international travel".
By Joseph Nye, April 15, 2002 - "Globalism versus globalization? Many people would think the two terms refer to the same phenomenon. However, there are important differences between the two. Globalism, at its core, seeks to describe and explain nothing more than a world which is characterized by networks of connections that span multi-continental distances. ... In contrast, globalization refers to the increase or decline in the degree of globalism. ... In short, consider globalism as the underlying basic network, while globalization refers to the dynamic shrinking of distance on a large scale. ... Does this suggest that globalism declined or rose between 1914 and 1945? It depends on the dimension, or sphere, of globalism one is referring to...".
By Ishaan Tharoor in November 2016 at 'washingtonpost.com/news/':
"... 'We will no longer surrender this country, or its people, to the false song of globalism'. That was then-Republican presidential candidate - now nominee - Donald Trump, delivering his first full speech on foreign policy in April [2016].
... The 'nation-state', not the international order, Trump declared in April, was 'the true foundation for happiness and harmony.'
... It's been fueled by American conspiracy mongers on the far-right, such as Alex Jones of the Infowars website, who has decried 'globalism' writ large for at least half a decade ... Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon said on radio the week before the American election. 'People want more control of their country. They're very proud of their countries. They want borders. They want sovereignty. It's not just a thing thats happening in any one geographic space.' ...".
On 19 Sept. 2017, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP at UN:
"...We are renewing our commitment to the first duty of every government: The duty of our citizens. This bond is the source of America's strength, and that of every responsible nation represented here today. ... Most important of all,
nations that are home to patriots: Men and women who are willing to sacrifice for their countries, their fellow citizens and for all that is best in the human spirit. In remembering the great victory that led to this body's founding, we must never forget that those heroes who fought against evil also fought for the nations that they loved. Patriotism led the Poles to die to save Poland,
the French to fight for a free France, and the Brits to stand strong for Britain. Today, if we do not invest ourselves, our hearts, and our minds in our nations, if we will not build strong families, safe communities, and healthy societies for ourselves, no one can do it for us. We cannot wait for someone else, for faraway countries or far off bureaucracies. We cannot do it. We must solve our problems to build our prosperity, to secure our future, or we will build vulnerable to decay, domination, and defeat. ...".
Donald Trump's speech in Warsaw - July 6, 2017 [by "niezalezna.pl"] -
"... We've come to your nation to deliver a very important message: America loves Poland and America loves the Polish people. Thank you.
The Poles have not only greatly enriched this region, but Polish-Americans have also greatly enriched the United States. And I was truly proud to
have their support in the 2016 election.
It is a profound honor to stand in this city by this monument to the Warsaw uprising, and to address the Polish nation that so many generations
have dreamed of, a Poland that is safe, strong and free.
...
Poland is the geographic heart of Europe. But more importantly, in the Polish people, we see the soul of Europe. Your nation is great because
your spirit is great and your spirit is strong.
For two centuries, Poland suffered constant and brutal attacks.
But while Poland could be invaded and occupied and its borders even erased from the map, it could never be erased from history or from your
hearts. In those dark days, you have lost your land, but you never lost your pride.
So it is with true admiration I can say today, that from the farms and villages of your countryside, to the cathedrals and squares of your great
cities, Poland lives, Poland prospers and Poland prevails.
...
And you are a people who know the true value of what you defend.
The triumph of the Polish spirit over centuries of hardship gives us all hope for a future in which good conquers evil and peace achieves victory
over war.
For Americans, Poland has been a symbol of hope since the beginning of our nation. Polish heroes and American patriots fought side by side in
our War of Independence and in many wars that followed. Our soldiers still serve together today in Afghanistan and Iraq,
combating the enemies
of all civilization.
For America's part, we have never given up on freedom and independence as the right and destiny of the Polish people. And we never, ever will.
Our two countries share a special bond forged by unique histories and national characters. It's a fellowship that exists only among people who
have fought and bled and died for freedom.
The signs of this friendship stand in our nation's capital. Just steps from the White House, we've raised statues of men with names like Pulaski
and Kosciuszko.
The same is true in Warsaw, where street signs carry the name of George Washington and a monument stands to
one of the world's greatest
heroes, Ronald Reagan.
And so, I am here today not just to visit an old ally, but to hold it up as an example for others who seek freedom and who wish to summon the
courage and
the will to defend our civilization.
The story of Poland is the story of a people who have never lost hope, who have never been broken and who have never, ever forgotten who they
are.
...
We are fighting hard against radical Islamic terrorism. And we will prevail. We cannot accept those who reject our values and who use hatred to
justify violence against the innocent.
Today, the West is also confronted by the powers that seek to test our will, undermine our confidence and challenge our interests.
To meet new forms of aggression, including propaganda, financial crimes and cyber warfare, we must adapt our alliance to compete effectively
in new ways and on all new battlefields.
We urge Russia to cease its destabilizing activities in Ukraine and elsewhere and its support for hostile regimes, including Syria and Iran, and to
instead join the community of responsible nations
in our fight against common enemies and in defense of civilization itself.
Finally, on both sides of the Atlantic, our citizens are confronted by yet another danger, one firmly within our control. This danger is invisible to
some but familiar to the Poles: the steady creep of government bureaucracy that drains the vitality and wealth of the people.
The West became great, not because of paperwork and regulations, but because people were allowed to chase their dreams and pursue their
destinies.
Americans, Poles and nations of Europe value freedom and sovereignty.
We must work together to confront forces, whether they come inside or
out, from the south or the east, that threaten over time to undermine these values and to erase the bonds of culture, faith and tradition that make
us who we are.
If left unchecked, these forces will undermine our courage, sap our spirit and weaken our will to defend ourselves and our societies.
But just as our adversaries and enemies of the past learned here in Poland, we know that these forces, too, are doomed to fail if we want them to
fail.
And we do indeed want them to fail.
They are doomed not only because our alliance is strong, our countries are resilient and our power is unmatched. To all of that, you have to say,
everything is true.
Our adversaries, however, are doomed because we will never forget who we are. And if we don't forget who we are, we just can't be beaten.
Americans will never forget. The nations of Europe will never forget.
We are the fastest and the greatest community. There is nothing like our community of nations.
The world has never known anything like our
community of nations.
...
And above all, we value the dignity of every human life, protect the rights of every person and share the hope of every soul to live in freedom.
That is who we are. Those are the priceless ties that bind us together as nations, as allies and as a civilization.
What we have, what we inherited from our - and - and you know this better than anybody and you see it today, with this incredible group of
people - what we've inherited from our ancestors has never existed to this extent before. And if we fail to preserve it, it will never, ever exist
again. So we cannot fail.
This great community of nations has something else in common. In every one of them, it is the people, not the powerful, who have always
formed the foundation of freedom and the cornerstone of our defense.
The people have been that foundation here in Poland, as they were right here in Warsaw. And they were the foundation from the very, very
beginning in America.
Our citizens did not win freedom together, did not survive horrors together, did not face down evil together only to lose our freedom to a lack
of pride and confidence in our values. We did not and we will not. We will never back down.
...
The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive. Do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any
cost? Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage
to preserve our civilization in
the face of those who would subvert
and destroy it? We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if
we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive.
If anyone forgets the critical importance of these things, let them come to one country that never has, let them come to Poland... and let them
come here to Warsaw and learn the story of the Warsaw Uprising.
...
Those heroes remind us that the West was saved with the blood of patriots, that each generation must rise up and play their part in its defense and
that every foot of ground and
every last inch of civilization is worth defending with your life.
Our own fight for the West does not begin on the battlefield. It begins with our minds, our wills and our souls. Today, the ties that unite our
civilization are no less vital and demand no less defense than that bare shred of land on which the hope of Poland once totally rested.
Our freedom, our civilization and our survival depend on these bonds of history, culture and memory. And today, as ever, Poland is in our heart,
and its people are in that fight.
Just as Poland could not be broken, I declare today for the world to hear that the West will never, ever be broken. Our values will prevail, our
people will thrive, and
our civilization will triumph.
...".
According to the Oxford dictionary, the word globalization was first employed in the 1930. It entered the Merriam-Webster dictionary in
1961 [year 1951 it's mistake !].
Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, is an American company that publishes dictionaries; George and Charles Merriam founded the company, but after Noah Webster died, the company bought the rights to An American Dictionary of the English Language from Webster's estate [Merriam-Webster];
the word globalization itself appears in Merriam Webster's Third New International Dictionary of 1961. The term "Webster's" has become a generic trademark, now published by Merriam-Webster.
"Globalization is not new as a phenomenon but the word itself took hold only recently. The Oxford English Dictionary records a first use in English in 1930 (in a different context, moreover) ...",
more at: historynewsnetwork.org/article.
Kaurinkoski - 2011, wrote:
"...Oxford English Dictionary, the word 'globalization was first employed in a publication entitled Towards New Education in 1930, to
denote a holistic view of human experience in education".
Robert Bruce Raup (1888 - 1976), was a Professor in the Philosophy of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. He was a
well-known writer in the 1930s.
His bibliography: The Foundation of Human Behavior (1925), mentioned above Toward a New Education (1930), Problems in Philosophy of
Education (1932).
He served as minister of the American Presbyterian Church in Havana, Cuba from 1914 to 1915. In 1921, he entered graduate studies at
Teachers College, Columbia University where he was a student of John Dewey. Columbia University (officially Columbia University in the
City of New York) is a private Ivy League research university in Upper Manhattan, New York City. Raup moved to Palo Alto, California.
His mother was Fanny (Mitchell) Raup, wife of Rev. G. P. Raup.
By Deborah Stanley:
"...Mr. MITCHELL was first married ... 1852, to Miss Catherine Ann, daughter of Casper and Susan (WIRT) MILLER. Mrs. MITCHELL
was born ... 1827, in Dauphin County, Pa., and died ... 1878 ...
There was born of this union five daughters, ...
Effie J., the eldest daughter ... the wife of Prof. E. L. SHENEY, of Dayton; [above] Fanny [born 1858], married the Rev. G. P. RAUP, a
prominent business man of Moorefield Township ...;
Anna Mary is the wife of the Rev. S. E. GREENAWALT, who has charge of a
congregation at Osborn...
The present wife of Mr. MITCHELL, to whom he was married in 1881, was formerly Miss Sarah, daughter of the Rev. Ezra KELLER, the
founder of Wittenberg College and its first President. ... Her mother bore the maiden name of Caroline ROUTZAHN...".
Gustavus Alvin Raup was born in 1893, in Ohio, to Gustavus Philip Raup and named above Fanny Raup (born Mitchell).
Gustavus was born 1851, in Turbotville, PA. Fanny was born in 1858, in Lagonda, Clark Co., Ohio.
Gustavus had 9 siblings.
He was buried in Ohio.
Above R. Bruce Raup was born in Clark County, Ohio to Gustavas Philip and Fanny Mitchell Raup in 1888.
Theodore Levitt, 81, the former Harvard Business Review editor who coined the term "globalization," died June 28, 2006,
at his home in Belmont.
See: Marcelo M. Suárez-Orozco, Desirée Qin-Hilliard - 2004.
The term globalization was apparently first published in a 1962 article in Spectator magazine [The Spectator (Cerami, 5 October 1962)],
but it began to enter everyday English usage after the 1962 publication of Marshall McLuhan's Gutenberg Galaxy. "Globalism" is an even
more recent term and appeared for the first time in the 1986 second edition of the Oxford English Dictionary
[by
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Globalization].
The 5th October 1962 was a historic day for popular culture - with the first Beatles single Love Me Do and the premiere of the James Bond
film; and Charles A. Cerami, was writing 'The U.S. Eyes Greater Europe', The Spectator, 5 October 1962, 495.
At http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/washingtonpost/:
"CERAMI CHARLES A., [born] 1920 - February 5, 2010. Charles A. Cerami, a third generation Washingtonian who authored 13 books
and over 300 magazine articles ... While still a student at Georgetown, his fluency in Italian, Spanish, French and German enabled him to
become a Senior Tanslator at age 19, first in the Post Office Department, then in the Department of Justice. Cerami joined Austenal, Inc.
... In 1960 he joined Kiplinger Washington Editors where for 20 years he served as Foreign Affairs Editor, meanwhile continuing to write
independently. His books spanned topics including business management, investment methods, the formation of the European Common
Market, ... Cerami was a member of the Overseas Writers Club and the Washington Institute of Foreign Affairs. He is survived by his long-
time partner, Mary Ann Gale; a daughter, Victoria Huckenpahler and a grandson, B. James Huckenpahler, all of Washington
... Published in The Washington Post on Feb. 17, 2010
{acc. to www.kiplinger.com/customer-service/
above named Kiplinger Washington Editors - "Started in 1920 by a former AP economics reporter, Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc., is
a closely held company managed for more than eight decades by three generations of the Kiplinger family - founder W. M. Kiplinger (1891-
1967); his son Austin H. Kiplinger (b. 1918-2015); and Austin's sons Todd L. Kiplinger (1945-2008), and Knight A. Kiplinger (b. 1948),
who is currently editor in chief and president".
W. M. Kiplinger (b. 1891) - "He attended Ohio State University from 1908 until 1912 and was a member of Sigma Pi Fraternity. He
moved to Washington, D.C. in 1916 and started the company Kiplinger by 1920."
Sigma Pi Fraternity - Sigma Pi is an international secret and social collegiate fraternity founded in 1897 at Vincennes University. See
Robert George Patterson. With the expulsion of Patterson at end of 1909, Sigma Pi had 5 chapters: Vincennes University, University of
Illinois, Ohio State University, Temple University, and the University of Pennsylvania. At this time the Fraternity redesigned its badge, coat of
arms, and ritual, becoming Sigma Pi as it is known today.
By https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma_Pi: Founder - James Thompson Kingsbury (1877 - 1950) descended from the Kingsbury
family who settled in Massachusetts in 1615. Graduated Vincennes University in 1897. He was a member of the Christian Church and of
Masonic Lodges in Tombstone, Arizona and Phoenix}."
"... Yet the word 'globalization' is not that new. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word 'globalization' was used for the
first time in 1962, in an article in The Spectator (Cerami, 1962). In this article, titled 'The US Eyes Greater Europe', it occurs in the following
sentence, 'After so long privately chiding the French for their fear of mondialisation, the Americans are struck by the thought that
globalisation is, indeed a staggering concept'. The vocabulary in a dictionary generally omits words that are too fashionable, too technical, or
only marginally used. Globalization is neither new, nor only in usage for a short period of time. Maybe the word is only rarely used?
[copyright by wikireedia.net/wikireedia/images/8/]".
As early as 1962 the Canadian visionary Marshall McLuhan wrote that the electronic age was turning all humanity into a 'global tribe'.
Herbert Marshall McLuhan, (1911 - 1980) was a Canadian professor, philosopher, and public intellectual. "...His mother was a Baptist
schoolteacher who later became an actress. His father was a Methodist and had a real estate business in Edmonton ... He entered Trinity Hall,
Cambridge {UK} in the autumn of 1934, where he studied under I. A. Richards and F. R. Leavis, and was influenced by New Criticism.
... Together with Harold Innis, Eric A. Havelock, and Northrop Frye, McLuhan and Carpenter have been characterized as the Toronto
School of communication theory. ... {In TORONTO} Anatol Rapoport was his neighbour ...
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_McLuhan]".
Above mentioned F. R. Leavis:
Frank Raymond "F. R." Leavis b. 1895, died in 1978, a British literary critic, at Downing College, Cambridge and later at the
University of York.
Above Anatol Rapoport: Anatol Rapoport / Анато́лий Бори́сович Рапопо́рт, b. 1911, a Russian-Jewish-born American
mathematical psychologist. Rapoport was born in Лозовая / Lozova, Kharkov Governorate, Russia / Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine, into a
secular Jewish family. Anatol Rapoport was named after the paternal grandfather. His father Munya Haim Ber (later Boris)
Naftulevich Rapoport (1888-?) and the mother Хана-Удл Адель Пинхусовна nee Рапопорт, from Czerkasy;
in 1921 moved to US; 1922, Anatol came to the United States, and in 1928 he became a naturalized citizen; he was a member of the
American Communist Party for three years.
A notable scholar of the Rapoport branch included R. Khaim Kohen Rapoport, who lived in Lviv and died there in 1771. He was one of
the key "talmudists" involved in the Frankist debates set up by the Archbishop Dembowski in 1757. R. Khaim's descendants include the
Rapoport-Bick dynasty. The Rapoport-Bick dynasty was the most important of all the non-chasidic rabbinic dynasties of Medzhybizh, in
Ukraine. The Rapoport dynasty traces its roots back to Rabbi Jacob Emden (1697-1776).
At www.globalresearch.ca/ we read [by Andrew Gavin Marshall - Global Research, June 24, 2010]: "...all global power structures: the
'global political awakening'. The term was coined by Zbigniew Brzezinski, and refers to the fact that, as Brzezinski wrote: 'For the first
time in history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive. Global activism is generating a
surge in the quest for cultural respect and economic opportunity in a world scarred by memories of colonial or imperial domination'. ...
The 'Technological Revolution' (or 'Technetronic' Revolution, as Brzezinski termed it in 1970) involves two major geopolitical
developments. The first is that as technology advances, systems of mass communication rapidly accelerate, and the worlds people are able to
engage in instant communication with one another and gain access to information from around the world..." (see Zbigniew Brzezinski, The
Global Political Awakening. The New York Times: December 16, 2008).
In his speech [on 27th April 1961] President Kennedy addresses his discontent with the press's news coverage before, and during, and after the Bay of Pigs incident, suggesting there is a need for "far greater public information" and "far greater official secrecy". Why?
On April the 28th, 1961 we read on the 'JFK Tells of Red Menace',
"President Kennedy told the nations newspaper publishers Thursday night that no formally declared war ever posed as great a threat to American security as does the rampant worldwide menace of communism. In view of this deadly challenge, he urged newspapers across the land to re-examine their obligations in the light of global danger and, in presenting the news, to heed the duty of self-restraint. Kennedy ... speaking at the annual Waldorf-Astoria dinner of the Bureau of Advertising of the American Newspaper Publishers Association, suggested there is a need for greater public information, and at the same time a need for greater official secrecy...".
On April 28, 1961, President Kennedy explained what is meant by the term: "The Communist conspiracy".
We read The Address in Chicago at a Dinner of the Democratic Party of Cook County on April 28, 1961:
"Mayor Daley, Governor Kerner, Senator Douglas, Congressman Dawson, Chairman Cullerton ... ladies and gentlemen: ... We live in a hazardous and dangerous time. ... Now our great responsibility is to be the chief defender of freedom, in this time of maximum danger. Only the United States has the power and the resources and the determination.
We have committed ourselves to the defense of dozens of countries stretched around the globe who look to us for independence, who look to us for the defense of their freedom. We are prepared to meet our obligations, but we can only defend the freedom of those who are determined to be free themselves.
... The Russians and the Chinese, containing within their borders nearly a billion people, totally mobilized for the advance of the Communist system,
operating from narrow, interior lines of communication, pressuring on Southeast Asia with the masses of the Chinese armies potentially ready to move-of the Russians who hold great power potentially in the Middle East and Western Europe ...
There is no easy answer to the dilemmas that we face. Our great ally is the fact that people do desire to be free, that people will sacrifice everything in their desire to maintain their independence.
And as the true nature of the Communist conspiracy becomes better known around the globe, when people come to realize - as they surely will - that the Communist advance does not represent a means of liberation but represents a final enslavement,
then I believe that they will rally to the cause to which we have given our support and our commitment".
The operation named the Bay of Pigs was launched in April 1961; the Cuban armed forces destroyed the invading force within three days;
this failed action has caused repercussions among the leaders of the CIA, and were dismissed in autumn 1961, among others, Director Allen Dulles, also
CIA Deputy Director Charles Cabell, and
Deputy Director for Plans Richard Mervin Bissell Jr.; on November 29th, 1961, the White House released about a resignation letter signed by Dulles.
Compare three speeches: 1961-2016.
At 'avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century' on the Military-Industrial Complex Speech, of Dwight D. Eisenhower, on
January 17, 1961, we read:
"Perhaps best known for advocating that the nation guard against the potential influence of
the military-industrial complex, a term he is credited with coining, the speech also expressed concerns about planning for the
future and the dangers of massive spending, especially deficit spending, the prospect of the domination of science through
Federal funding and, conversely, the domination of science-based public policy by what he called a 'scientific-technological
elite'...".
John F. Kennedy in his Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, on April 27, 1961
acc. to 'jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/JFK-Speeches':
"...The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically
opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and
unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little
value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in
insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced
need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official
censorship and concealment. ...
Today no war has been declared - and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional
fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The
survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no
missiles have been fired.
... It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions - by the
government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the
world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence
- on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on
guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.
It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and
political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are
silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in
short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match."
And by 'charismanews.com/politics/events' -
Donald Trump on 10/14/2016,
during a speech in Florida, Republican presidential nominee [said]:
"... The Washington establishment, and the financial and media corporations that fund it, exists for only one reason: to
protect and enrich itself. The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election. ...
This is not simply another
4-year election.
This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization
that will determine whether or not We the People
reclaim control over our government.
The political establishment that is trying everything to stop us is the same group
responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration and economic and foreign policies that have bled
this country dry. The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs
...
It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped
our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.
... The Clinton Machine is at the center of this power structure. ... The most powerful weapon deployed by the Clintons
is the corporate media. ...
For them, it is a war - and for them, nothing is out of bounds.
This is a struggle for the survival of our nation. This election will determine whether we are a free nation, or whether we
have only the illusion of Democracy but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the
system.
This is not just conspiracy but reality, and you and I know it. The establishment and their media enablers wield
control over this nation through means that are well-known.
Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a
racist, a xenophobe and morally deformed.
They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to destroy your career
and reputation. And they will lie, lie and lie even more.
...
Our great civilization, here in America and across the civilized world, has come upon a moment of reckoning.
|